You're on the right track with Vector3.Lerp (but not Slerp - that's more for interpolating directional vectors rather than positions).

What you need is to just add a curve-based value to the object's height in addition to the straight-line interpolation that Lerp gives you. You can get a nice curved value range which goes from 0 to 1 and back to 0, by feeding a range from zero to PI into the Mathf.Sin function.

Here's a small c# example script which demonstrates:

using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;

public class Trajectory : MonoBehaviour {

    Vector3 startPos = new Vector3(0, 0, 0);
    Vector3 endPos = new Vector3(0, 0, 10);
    float trajectoryHeight = 5;

    // Update is called once per frame
    void Update () {

        // calculate current time within our lerping time range
        float cTime = Time.time * 0.2f;

        // calculate straight-line lerp position:
        Vector3 currentPos = Vector3.Lerp(startPos, endPos, cTime);

        // add a value to Y, using Sine to give a curved trajectory in the Y direction
        currentPos.y += trajectoryHeight * Mathf.Sin(Mathf.Clamp01(cTime) * Mathf.PI);

        // finally assign the computed position to our gameObject:
        transform.position = currentPos;

    }
}

Thanks a lot for your quick reply. In my case your code didn't really work. Using Time.time isn't the best idea (it would probably work only when you first hit play in the editor, as it accumulates)

Here's the code I used, which does pretty much what I wanted:

Vector3 targetPosition = target.position;



    float timerThrow = (object.position - targetPosition).magnitude;

    float cTime = timerThrow;
    Vector3 startPos = object.position;

    while ((object.position - targetPosition).sqrMagnitude > 0.01F)
    {

        cTime -= 0.4F;

        object.position = Vector3.Slerp(targetPosition, startPos, cTime / timerThrow);
        yield return 0;
    }

Because I added the distance between the 2 points in the equation (the magnitude), the animation has the same speed regardless of the distance between the 2 points. If you know any good way to optimize the above code, to run even faster, please let me know.